The Digital Reader

Read More, Tote Less

The Digital Reader header image 1

Morning Links 13 July 2010

July 13th, 2010 by · 1 Comment · links post

China Copyright Disputes Threaten E-Book Industry

A copyright lawsuit for China’s largest e-book reader manufacturer is highlighting problems that are holding back development of the country’s e-book market.The company, Hanvon, is being sued by the Zhonghua Book Company for alleged copyright infringement of its Twenty-Four Histories and Draft History of the Qing Dynasty. The works are considered authoritative in the field of the nation’s pre-communist history. Hanvon said it obtained the legitimate copyright through a deal with the China Written Works Copyright Society, but Zhonghua has nonetheless requested $136,000 in damages.

Content Farms Are Slaughtering Books

Much overlooked in the recent fixation on the transition from physical books to e-books has been the cratering sales of backlist books. One of the mainstays of the six big publishing houses is the massive amount of subject nonfiction they produce.

For many years, Barnes & Noble (BKS) was attacking that base by producing its own no-name how-to, advice, and travel books under the Sterling imprint owned by B&N. But just as the bookselling giant was trying to undercut publishers, a new threat to these bread-and-butter books emerged in the form of the Internet.

Ebook deals ‘not remotely fair’ on authors

The chair of the Society of Authors, Tom Holland, has hit out at publishers’ attempt to seize control over electronic rights, calling ebook deals that lock authors in for the duration of copyright “not remotely fair”.

Speaking at the Romantic Novelists’ Association’s annual conference last week, Holland urged authors to push for ebook royalties that are “considerably higher” than the standard of around 25%. Although Holland said the market for ebooks is only about 1% of the total UK market, it is “growing fast” and the Society of Authors believes that, given publishers will eventually have much lower warehousing and distribution costs for ebooks, royalties should be divided 50/50.

Politics and the English-language publisher

“Our civilization is decadent and our language — so the argument runs — must inevitably share in the general collapse.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language

Recently, one of the best remaining independent Toronto bookstores, This Ain’t the Rosedale Library, closed down and part of the problem with this sad passing is the same one that publishers are having; their old role as community centerpieces has been devalued. Online sales certainly didn’t help, but the traditional role of books as a focal point for shared cultural experience has died.

Tags: ····

One Comment so far ↓

  • Alexander Inglis

    re: Politics and the English-language publisher

    The closure of “This Ain’t The Rosedale Library” wasn’t so much a result of independent bookstores … “their old role as community centerpieces has been devalued” … so much as simply not responding to evolving customer needs. I lived across the street from TATRL for many years; they moved last year to save on rent and closed only months later unable to pay rent at the newer location.

    In its day, it was a very fine store. One of the changes in publishing that gets overlooked is what role magazine sales play in keeping bookshops afloat. The magazine industry — mainstream and specialty mags — has shrunk enormously in the past few years and the culprit again is the Internet. Bookstores, especially smaller ones, derive major profits selling magazines. No magazines … no sales … no ability to pay the rent.

    The second thing overlooked is the role of special orders which used to handled by such shops. But with both Amazon and Abebooks as a source for new and used titles, and often much more efficiently than any indie can do, this second important revenue stream dried up.

    What’s left? Lattes and poetry readings — neither of which TATRL pursued.

    Becoming a focal point and expert in a specialty, and reaching out beyond the premises’ front door onto online and in partnerships with others is one important way to avoid being devalued. But it’s a funny thing: partnerships are exactly where indie folks — normally fiercely independent — are least likely to have the skills or inclination to explore.

    Ultimately, if the enterprise lacks value for the evolving consumer, it’s the enterprise that is responsible for the “devaluation”, not the Internet and not the customer.

Leave a Comment